Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Oh you pedos!

Oh you pedos, fapping to children and cubs on FA. It makes me laugh when you try to defend how “bringing out your inner child” or the fact it’s legal as it’s not a human child, boy, are you sick in the head!
Well, I’m going to tackle the biggest debacle that ever graced FA since it was born; cub porn. Now, I know I’ll get tackled for saying I don’t like it, because apparently, every single pedo man behind their computer thinks it’s not illegal per se in FA’s AUP and ToS, but it’s against the law to produce and view these images. Look at this according to www.missingkids.com
“Under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256), child pornography1 is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where  


  • the production of the visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or


  • the visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or


  • the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.”
So, according to the law, pictures depicting child in any sexual activities and in the nude is illegal and you can be banned regardless of a website’s current rules. So, technically, just being on FA is apparently illegal!! Dragoneer really screwed up when his legal consultant gave a thumbs up, that’s assuming he has one as per website owner of an art site should have.
But what exactly sparked me to write something like this? Well, let’s look at this idiot’s journal and dissect how much intelligence he has.
“Let em Hate.


Sticks and stones may brake my bones, but words will never hurt me. :3


.....in most cases. Lol” [Journal Entry, FA user haloian]

Looking at this journal makes you first scratch your head and then you finally realize, “Jesus Christ! He’s a cub!” So, he really doesn’t care about haters of cub porn and just wanted to start shit with some people, because nearly more than ¾’s of the entire fandom aren’t walking pedo’s to begin with. Well, he apparently does care, as his journal is flooded with haters, not ass-kissing fan boys like I see in other drama-starting journals. Here’s a comment, then his reaction to said comment.
“Cub porn = pedophilia and is sick. Period. End of Story. Sick fucks.” [Comment, FA user Kwolf13]
“Burn in hell pl0x.” [Response to above comment, FA user haloian]
How childish can you get with something like that? Kwolf13 posted the obvious statement that is the view of cub porn and you apparently have to play the burn in hell card. Please, if you’re going to tell someone off, get original or don’t respond. Here’s the most stupid comment ever. Jea, an FA user who I defended earlier in a blog post about icon wars between admins and users, stated her opinion on the matter and backed her opinion up with logic and sources even (extra credit girl) and this was all that haloian could come up with:
“Stop. JUST STOP! FUCK! THIS JOURNAL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THEY ARE SAYING. DO YOU EVEN SEE THE CUB IN THE TITTLE OR BODY???” [Response to Jea, FA user haloian]
Seriously…childish much? I must admit, the cub side of you is really starting to come out in your feeble attempt at sounding smarter than Jea and using all caps, as per the internet rules, you are smarter when using all caps in an argument.
Then what’s the point of this entire blog? If you’re going to defend your sick and twisted reality of cub porn, then come up with a logical and decent counter-point to make yourself smarter.
Also, don’t even try to make your point in his journal, as he believes that blocking anyone against his statement is e-victory to him and gives him a hard-on. Hell, I made a counter-argument against his comment towards Jea and I still got blocked!


Oh, and as an update, he posted a journal to the Make-A-Wish foundation...he apparently gets turned on by little kids being happy!

UPDATE


Since last night's fiasco, you apparently can't comment once and state an opinion anymore, as it's hurting his feelings and must post this.
DON'T COMMENT HERE OR RISK BEING BLOCKED. 
THIS IS ONLY STAYING OPEN FOR A HARASSMENT TICKET! [Last Comment, FA user haloian]
Since he doesn't want anymore drama and stuff, at least respect the guy's wishes and don't, because he's right and further comments can result in a temp ban. Comment on here instead! 

7 comments:

Luna said...

Oh you.

I agree 100%. Pedophiles are disgusting, and no matter what form whether is be little children or furries, it's still disgusting, deplorable and people should be locked up permanently for it.

Bryan "Silver" Daniels? said...

He mad. It's adorable! :P

Soren said...

Well I'm not saying I'm for child porn or cub porn but the only way these idiots could get away with it is if they hand drawn and hand color the image. it's not stated that hand drawn pictures of nude children are illegal. I think that so long as it's hand drawn and hand colored, until ammended otherwise, it's perfectly legal... unfortunately. if they color or edit using their computer, THEN it's illegal; to my knowledge anyway all depends on how you look at it

Fapping to cubs is fun! :D said...

I am going to draw so much god damn cub rape porn just for you buddy, and laugh as you have spastic little attacks about it being like the real thing.
Haha, keep truckin buddy, someone will put you out of your misery someday I hope.

Calloe said...

That law was struck down a while ago. You're not very current in your facts. You're letting your extreme bias and hatred lead you to make incorrect statements by not researching enough. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Pornography_Prevention_Act_of_1996 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams#Important_notes.2Fdictation

Calum said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Calum said...

You seemed rather rude in this post; surprise, surprise. I will point out a few major flaws.

You haven't proven HOW we are "sick in the head".

"graced FA"
You obviously know nothing about the subject. FA didn't choose to ban cub porn, not really. Every penny of their funding had been taken by AlertPay; it was either Cub Porn, or the site. They didn't do it because THEY thought it was paedophilic.

Next, why do you think raping a child is illegal? Because it rips children's lives apart. Now, I'm not afraid to admit that I get horny over cub porn- but when someone faps over it, no child's life is ripped apart. Inf act, children aren't hurt at all. Also, the laws have changed (thank god). A DIGITAL image is legal, it's just the real deal that's illegal.